A new study reveals that legal abortion increases the risk of premature death in women by 50 percent.
A total of 989 studies carried out on deaths linked to pregnancy were analysed by researchers, as per Sage journal, to arrive at this conclusion.
Within the first 180 days, the risk of death from any cause is over twice as high following abortion compared to that following delivery. The risk of early death remains elevated for at least 10 years.
The studies reviewed also reveal a dose effect, with each exposure to abortion adding approximately a 50 percent increased risk of premature death in women compared to those who have never had abortions (Figure 2).
In contrast, delivering two or more babies improves longevity. Delivery is also linked to a reduction in mortality risks associated with abortion or miscarriage alone.
The systematic review, published in Sage Open Medicine, identified 989 maternal death studies, of which 68 were of the highest quality. These higher-quality studies were those that linked death certificates with other medical records to identify recent pregnancy outcomes.
Since death certificates often lack information about recent pregnancies, studies based on death certificates alone have proven to be notoriously incomplete.
Of the 68 higher-quality record linkage studies identified by the research team, only 11 provided results to allow comparison between death rates associated with different pregnancy outcomes: birth, abortion, miscarriage or other natural losses.
Has there been a deliberate cover-up?
According to the review's lead author Dr David Reardon, the elevated risk of death following pregnancy losses (abortion or miscarriage) was first identified in a study of the entire population of women in Finland in 1997.
Reardon is the director of the Elliot Institute, a research group focused on reproductive health issues.
Reardon said most of the record linkage studies published since 1997 could and should have investigated the differences in maternal death rates relative to pregnancy loss. But most researchers chose to only report on deaths associated with childbirth.
"It's difficult to believe that these maternal mortality specialists are unaware of the unanimity of the 11 large population studies from Finland, Denmark, and the United States in regard to elevated risks of death following reproductive loss," he said.
Reardon believes the lack of more data on deaths following pregnancy loss is most likely due to a bias against publishing results that might undermine international efforts to promote access to abortion in less developed countries.
As an example of selective reporting, Reardon cited a comprehensive record linkage study from Italy, in which the authors noted that they had identified deaths associated with miscarriage and induced abortion.
However, the authors subsequently refused to publish data allowing a comparison of maternal death rates relative to delivering or never pregnant women and those who had an abortion or miscarriage.
Reardon also said the fact that all record linkage studies reveal higher rates of mortality following abortion directly contradicts the assertion that abortion is 10-15 times "safer" than childbirth.
"That claim has always been based on comparing incomplete data from death certificates to an even more incomplete tally of deaths voluntarily reported by abortion providers," he said. "It is junk in, junk out science. Only record linkage studies provide solid data. Only record linkage studies provide a common standard for making comparisons."