Half a sentence, then Kharge's 'baap' remark: How the 'PM insulted' row began with a misunderstanding
Half a sentence, then Kharge's 'baap' remark: How the 'PM insulted' row began with a misunderstandingInstagram

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge's remark about Prime Minister Narendra Modi has triggered a political controversy after a man at a Congress event in Patna claimed that his full statement was not heard, leading to a misunderstanding. The incident has drawn criticism from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), with several leaders demanding an apology from Kharge.

The controversy began when Santosh Kumar, who was attending an event marking the 139th birth anniversary of Bihar's first Chief Minister, Shri Krishna Singh, was heard saying, "Modi kahin nahin jayega" (Modi will not go anywhere). Kharge responded, "Modi ka baap bhi jayega" (Even Modi's father will have to go), repeating the remark several times.

However, Kumar later claimed that his complete statement had been misunderstood. He said he was trying to convey that Modi would not leave power unless the public revolted. Following the exchange, some attendees allegedly assaulted Kumar and removed him from the venue.

Half a sentence, then Kharge’s ‘baap’ remark: How the ‘PM insulted’ row began with a misunderstanding
Half a sentence, then Kharge’s ‘baap’ remark: How the ‘PM insulted’ row began with a misunderstandingTwitter

The remark sparked a political backlash, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and several BJP leaders criticising Kharge's language and demanding an apology. The BJP also announced plans for nationwide protests over the comment.

The Congress defended its president, with party leaders arguing that his remarks were made in a political context and were not intended to hurt anyone. The incident has since become another flashpoint in the ongoing political confrontation between the Congress and the BJP.

The controversy highlights how a brief exchange at a political gathering can escalate into a larger dispute, particularly when the full context of a statement is contested.